send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Background
• India, a country which has one of the highest numbers of laws on its statute books, however, its implementation record is distressingly poor. • One of the reasons for the poor performance, aside from design issues, capacity constraints and corruption, is the near-complete absence of post legislative scrutiny or review of the laws. • Post-legislative reviews can assess whether the objectives and the anticipated effects of legislation have actually taken place on the ground. • Various governments have taken small steps in the direction of designing better laws such as making pre-legislative scrutiny of Bills mandatory through public feedback and identifying laws that need to be repealed but there is little discussion yet regarding the need for post-legislative review of laws.
What are the benefits of ex-post law reviews?
• To discover whether a law is working out in practice as it was intended • To assess whether the objectives and the anticipated effects of a piece of legislation have actually taken place on the ground • If not, to understand the reason and address it quickly and cost-effectively • It also helps to identify any unintended effects that may have arisen from the legislation • A key benefit would be the systematic collection of data that would be a pre-requisite of any evaluation of this kind. • Therefore, regular post-legislative evaluations would translate into better laws.
Lessons from other countries • In the 1990s, many European countries as well as the US, Australia and Canada developed “better regulation” policies, which included ex-ante and ex-post evaluation of legislation. • The UK requires its laws to be reviewed within three to five years of enactment. These reviews are conducted by existing Departmental Select Committees on the basis of a memoranda provided by a government department. • All Acts passed since 2005 are reviewed with a few exceptions such as budgets, very technical acts and trivial acts. • In Germany, ex-post evaluation is systematic and based on a standardized methodology set out in guidelines for public administrators. • France requires mandatory periodic evaluation of legislation, which is enshrined within the law itself. • In the US, each standing committee, except Committee on Appropriation, is required to review and study, on a continuing basis, the application, administration, execution, and effectiveness of the laws dealing with the subject matter over which the committee has jurisdiction. • In Australia, most laws have to be reviewed within two years and they expire after 10 years. • In Canada, a most laws have review and sunset clauses.
The way ahead:
• There is an urgent need to develop a “better regulation” policy tool for India on the similar lines of above countries. • The present government’s promise of delivering “good governance” could get a boost if it adopted post-legislative evaluation as a policy tool. • The Law Commission or an expert committee could first decide, with inputs from government and non-government stakeholders, the scope of post-legislative scrutiny by defining its boundaries, the types of legislation that require scrutiny, benchmarks of a successful legislation, the procedure for scrutiny, the body that should undertake the scrutiny and the time-period of the scrutiny. • India could then incorporate within its legislation, a provision for systematic review of the law.
By: Mona Kaushal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources