send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
With the President's assent, the National Judicial Appointments Commission has become a constitutional entity. All appointments to the Supreme Court and the 24 high courts will now be made by the commission, replacing the collegium system introduced in 1993. The chief difference between the two lies in giving the executive not just a greater say but a veto power in the selection of judges. In the six-member commission the government will have three representatives — the Law Minister and two "eminent persons". Though the commission is to be headed by the Chief Justice of India, any two dissenting notes can disqualify a candidate. The collegium system, no doubt, has its flaws, including judges appointing judges in an opaque manner. But instead of bringing in corrections, introducing transparency and retaining the judiciary's pre-dominant say in judicial matters, the balance has swung in favour of the executive. Giving the government the veto power may lead to the appointment of pliable judges, political interference in the delivery of justice and a threat to the much-cherished independence of the judiciary.
By: Vishal ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources