What does the term BEPS recently in news signify? How has it affected the current fiscal policy of the government?

 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) refers to those instances where gaps between different tax rules leads to tax avoidance causing harm to the government. It refers to all those artificial arrangements where:

• Due to gaps in application of the bilateral tax treaties, cross border activities may go untaxed in any of the two countries.
• No or low tax is paid by shifting profits to low tax jurisdictions and shifting losses and high expenditures to high tax jurisdictions.

Further, the spread of the digital economy has also posed challenges for international taxation.
Over the years, the MNCs have artificially reduced their corporate tax outgo by shifting to lower tax jurisdictions. As per OECD estimates, the base erosion and profit shifting has resulted in a loss of $100-240 billion every year to countries which is around 4-10% of global corporate income tax revenue.
OECD Action Plan on BEPS
Originally, OECD had started the BEPS project in response to the 2008 financial crisis in order to create sustainable economic growth. It was formally launched in 2012 by the G-20 Finance Ministers who in turn called on OECD to develop an action plan to address BEPS issues in a co-ordinated and comprehensive manner and develop an action plan with inter alia, following points:

• There is a need to effectively prevent the double non-taxation and low taxation by checking the artificial arrangements to reduce tax liability.
• Countries should adopt new consensus-based anti-abuse provisions and new international standards to ensure the coherence of corporate income taxation at international level to complement the existing standards.
• Rise of digital economy has furthered the problem.

In 2013, the OECD came up with an action plan to address the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting menace. This action plan has 15 actions points. In summary, the 15 OECD action points seek to develop a more coherent international system to address the problems of digital economy taxation, treaty abuse, transfer pricing, aggressive tax planning and disputes related to such problems. The document says that countries should build consensus on how to effectively address the tax compliance of digital products and services and effective collection of VAT/GST with respect to cross border supply of digital products and services. It talks about neutralising the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements and strengthening the CFC (controlled foreign company) rules. It aims to improve transparency both for business and governments by introducing commonly agreed minimum standards for tax administration across countries.
Hybrid mismatch arrangements
Hybrid entity refers to the companies which might be treated differently in two tax jurisdictions. A hybrid instrument is one which is treated differently in two tax jurisdiction i.e. debt in one and equity in other. The tax planners exploit the asymmetries between different tax jurisdictions through the use of a hybrid entity or a hybrid instrument. The OECD action plan calls for developing model treaty provisions regarding domestic rule to neutralize the effect of hybrid mismatch arrangements.

Current Status
The G20-OECD led project on base erosion and profit sharing (BEPS) is currently taking a firm shape. It aims to fulfil the 15 points of the G20-OECD on the multifarious aspects of international tax policy by December 2015. On October 5, 2015, OECD has released a Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) package containing final reports on 15 identified focus areas. This report includes recommendations for significant changes in the key elements of international tax architecture. In 2016, OECD is expected to come out with a multilateral convention to prevent the treaty abuses.

India’s Stance on multilateral / Bilateral Tax Regime
India has also responded positively to the G20-OECD led BEPS project. For a developing country like India, any such regime which effectively addresses the treaty shopping would result in more tax revenues. Further, India is also in the process of making tax treaties sustainable with its bilateral partners such as Mauritius. India also has become a signatory of the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information on 3rd June, 2015. These new global standards on automatic exchange of information, known as Common Reporting Standards (CRS), once implemented, will facilitate automatic exchange of taxpayers’ information between treaty partner countries for speedy dispute resolution and reducing instance of base erosion through use of dubious structures/financing instruments in cross-border transactions.
Further, India has also signed the Inter-Government Agreement (IGA) on Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) with United States.

India and BEPS
India has been actively participating in the G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ('BEPS') project and as expected the Country-by-Country reporting requirements have already been announced in Budget 2016. However what came as a big surprise was the proposal to introduce a tax on digital economy transactions as was discussed in the BEPS Action Plan 1. India is probably the first country to introduce such a tax more so in such a novel way because the equalization levy is neither an income tax nor a VAT.
Finance Bill 2016 has introduced Chapter VIII in the Finance Bill, 2016 for charging an "equalization levy" of 6% on certain specified services. Specified services have been defined to mean online advertisement, any provision for digital advertising space or any other facility or service for the purpose of online advertisement and includes any other service as may be notified by the Central Government in this behalf. This levy is required to be collected by the following persons while making a payment to non-resident:
1. Person resident in India and carrying on business or profession
2. Non-resident having a permanent establishment in India

Report error