send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Please specify
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Charging of exorbitant fees in private schools is a major cause of concern in India. Steep hike in tuition fees along with additional costs such as fees for transport, extra-curricular activities and sports will add much burden on parents. Regulating school fees is one of the most significant legal and political challenges policymakers in India face. Schools justify their fee hike as the costs of maintaining a fully functional private school with quality teaching and world-class infrastructure are quite steep.In this context, balancing the autonomy of private schools and their public welfare function becomes a contentious issue.
Can private schools arbitrarily hike fees?
Parents in urban areas are increasingly turning to private schools, where learning outcomes are better. However, with more autonomy these private institutions are charging exorbitant fee. The constitutional basis for regulating the fees charged by private schools was considered by the Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002). The Supreme Court held that regulatory measures imposed on private schools must ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere and infrastructure and the prevent maladministration. In Islamic Academy of Education and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors (2003), a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that these institutions can have the autonomy to generate “surplus” which must be used for their betterment and growth. However, the word ‘surplus’ is not clearly defined.
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that any private school in Delhi running on land allotted by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has to take the permission of the Delhi government before hiking the fees. While private schools have the autonomy to generate surplus, there has to be a balance between autonomy of such institutions and the measures taken to prevent commercialisation of education.
How did different states respond to prevent schools from charging exorbitant prices?
Several State governments have either enacted fee regulation laws or are in the process of framing them. Tamil Nadu follows the fee fixation model whereby a government committee is empowered to verify and approve fee structures proposed by private schools.
Then why is there a concern?
Different State’s models to curb fee hike menace are affected by the challenges of weak implementation, a lack of capacity and constant legal challenges posed by private school associations. According to the CAG report, it is found that many private schools collect money from parents under false heads, while at the same time, teachers are being underpaid, and accounts misrepresented. Existing legislative efforts have made an incomplete assessment of the deeper problems with financial management and accounting practices adopted by private schools.
What are some of the considerations for effective policy?
Efforts are on to regularise the fee structure in the Indian schools. Following are some of the considerations for effective education policy.
By: Arpit Gupta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources